Recall Release
CLASS I RECALL
FSIS-RC-046-2008
HEALTH RISK: HIGHCongressional and Public Affairs (202) 720-9113 Amanda Eamich WASHINGTON, Nov. 28, 2008 - Home Market Foods, Inc., a Norwood, Mass., firm, is recalling approximately 5,250 pounds of ready-to-eat frozen beef sandwich portions that may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service announced today.
Recommendations For People At Risk For Listeriosis Wash hands with warm, soapy water before and after handling raw meat and poultry for at least 20 seconds. Wash cutting boards, dishes and utensils with hot, soapy water. Immediately clean spills. Keep raw meat, fish and poultry away from other food that will not be cooked. Use separate cutting boards for raw meat, poultry and egg products and cooked foods. Do not eat hot dogs, luncheon meats, bologna or other deli meats unless reheated until steaming hot. Do not eat refrigerated pâté, meat spreads from a meat counter or smoked seafood found in the refrigerated section of the store. Foods that don't need refrigeration, like canned tuna and canned salmon, are safe to eat. Refrigerate after opening. Do not drink raw (unpasteurized) milk and do not eat foods that have unpasteurized milk in them. Do not eat salads made in the store such as ham salad, chicken salad, egg salad, tuna salad or seafood salad. Do not eat soft cheeses such as Feta, queso blanco, queso fresco, Brie, Camembert cheeses, blue-veined cheeses and Panela unless it is labeled as made with pasteurized milk. Use precooked or ready-to-eat food as soon as you can. Listeria can grow in the refrigerator. The refrigerator should be 40 °F or lower and the freezer 0 °F or lower. Use an appliance thermometer to check the temperature of your refrigerator.
The following product is subject to recall:
3.5-ounce individually wrapped packages of "Blimpie FULLY COOKED SEASONED BEEF SHAVED STEAKS Thinly Sliced with Onions." Each label bear the establishment number "EST. 2727" inside the USDA mark of inspection as well as a printed Julian date of "3198," "3228" or "3238," on the products available for consumer purchase. The ready-to-eat frozen beef portions were produced on Nov. 14, 17, 18 and 20, 2008, and distributed to retail institutions in the Atlanta metropolitan area, California, Florida, Illinois and New York. The problem was discovered through company testing. FSIS has received no reports of illnesses associated with consumption of this product.
Class I recalls are announced for products that could cause serious illness or death. Please make sure that you do not use the products listed with the code date listed.
Watching out for your health
Rudy
Friday, November 28, 2008
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Recalls and the newest in melamine
Recall announcement today for allergens.
"Texas Firm Recalls Chicken Products Due to Undeclared Allergens
Recall Release
CLASS II RECALL
FSIS-RC-045-2008
HEALTH RISK: LOWCongressional and Public Affairs (202) 720-9113 Peggy RiekWASHINGTON, Nov. 26, 2008 - John Soules Foods, Inc., a Tyler, Texas, establishment, is recalling approximately 8,496 pounds of cooked chicken strip products. The chicken products may contain an undeclared allergen, wheat, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service announced today. Wheat is a known allergen, which is not declared on the label. The following products are subject to recall: [View Labels, PDF Only]
24-ounce bags of "John Soules Foods FULLY COOKED CHICKEN BREAST STRIPS WITH RIB MEAT, Italian Style, GLUTEN FREE." Each bag bears the establishment number "P-2128" inside the USDA mark of inspection. Additionally, the UPC code "034695 123973" as well as the "USE BY" date of "Dec 27 08" or "Jan 2 09" are included on the back of the bag.
24-ounce bags of "John Soules Foods FULLY COOKED CHICKEN BREAST STRIPS WITH RIB MEAT, Rotisserie Style, GLUTEN FREE." Each bag bears the establishment number "P-2128" inside the USDA mark of inspection. Additionally, the UPC code "034695 123980" as well as the "USE BY" date of "Dec 27 08" or "Jan 2 09" are included on the back of the bag. The chicken products were produced on Nov. 7 and 13, 2008, and were distributed to retail establishments in Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.The problem was discovered by the company. FSIS has received no reports of illness due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an allergic reaction should contact a physician."
There has also been an announcement about discovery of trace amounts of melamine in baby formula manufactured in the U.S. using domestic ingredients.
This discovery is an issue since we need more information on the source and no minimum level has been specified as being toxic for children.
Should there be any in the product?
More on this discussion later.
Be Safe
Rudy
"Texas Firm Recalls Chicken Products Due to Undeclared Allergens
Recall Release
CLASS II RECALL
FSIS-RC-045-2008
HEALTH RISK: LOWCongressional and Public Affairs (202) 720-9113 Peggy RiekWASHINGTON, Nov. 26, 2008 - John Soules Foods, Inc., a Tyler, Texas, establishment, is recalling approximately 8,496 pounds of cooked chicken strip products. The chicken products may contain an undeclared allergen, wheat, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service announced today. Wheat is a known allergen, which is not declared on the label. The following products are subject to recall: [View Labels, PDF Only]
24-ounce bags of "John Soules Foods FULLY COOKED CHICKEN BREAST STRIPS WITH RIB MEAT, Italian Style, GLUTEN FREE." Each bag bears the establishment number "P-2128" inside the USDA mark of inspection. Additionally, the UPC code "034695 123973" as well as the "USE BY" date of "Dec 27 08" or "Jan 2 09" are included on the back of the bag.
24-ounce bags of "John Soules Foods FULLY COOKED CHICKEN BREAST STRIPS WITH RIB MEAT, Rotisserie Style, GLUTEN FREE." Each bag bears the establishment number "P-2128" inside the USDA mark of inspection. Additionally, the UPC code "034695 123980" as well as the "USE BY" date of "Dec 27 08" or "Jan 2 09" are included on the back of the bag. The chicken products were produced on Nov. 7 and 13, 2008, and were distributed to retail establishments in Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.The problem was discovered by the company. FSIS has received no reports of illness due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an allergic reaction should contact a physician."
There has also been an announcement about discovery of trace amounts of melamine in baby formula manufactured in the U.S. using domestic ingredients.
This discovery is an issue since we need more information on the source and no minimum level has been specified as being toxic for children.
Should there be any in the product?
More on this discussion later.
Be Safe
Rudy
Monday, November 24, 2008
Unpasteurized or Raw Milk
In today's Fresno Bee a report noted that a civil suit had been brought against a California dairy for selling raw milk across state lines.
Why are people consuming raw milk? Advocates feel that pasteurization affects milk quality.
Being more scientific and food safety based, I feel that consumption of raw milk puts humans at unnecessary risk for illness and even death.
Pasteurization kills all of the bacteria that can kill you or can make you ill. The benefits greatly outweigh any quality concerns. Pasteurization prolongs shelf life. Conventional high-temperature short time pasteurization kills 90% of the bacteria in milk and 100% of the ones that can make us ill.
Protect your family drink pasteurized milk!
Be safe,
Rudy
Why are people consuming raw milk? Advocates feel that pasteurization affects milk quality.
Being more scientific and food safety based, I feel that consumption of raw milk puts humans at unnecessary risk for illness and even death.
Pasteurization kills all of the bacteria that can kill you or can make you ill. The benefits greatly outweigh any quality concerns. Pasteurization prolongs shelf life. Conventional high-temperature short time pasteurization kills 90% of the bacteria in milk and 100% of the ones that can make us ill.
Protect your family drink pasteurized milk!
Be safe,
Rudy
Friday, November 21, 2008
Product recalls for the past two days
FDA recalls as written:
PANOS Brands Recalls Vegan Rella Cheddar Block
Contact:Kathie Gibbs Borkowski (201) 843-8900 x 425
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE --Saddle Brook, NJ -- November 20, 2008 --- PANOS brands, of Saddle Brook, NJ is recalling Vegan Rella Cheddar Block, (a cheese substitute) with a Sell by date of 12/09/2008. This product is being recalled because it may possibly contain an undeclared milk protein. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk protein run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume this product. No other lot or variety of Vegan is involved.
The product was sold directly to the consumers from their retail stores located nationwide.
The recalled product is packed in 8oz packages with UPC Code 0 37983 00015 4 and a sell by date of 12/09/2008.
There was one reported incident of an allergic reaction associated with the consumption of the product. The product is manufactured by Swan Gardens/Tree of Life, Austell, GA. This recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the Food and Drug Administration.
Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. Issues Voluntary Recall on Wegmans Italian Classics Seasoned Tomato Sauce
Contact:Jo Natale 585-429-3627
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE -- Rochester, NY -- November 20, 2008 -- Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. is initiating a voluntary recall of 24 oz. Wegmans Italian Classics Seasoned Tomato Sauce with a “use-by- date of 11/26/08”, UPC 77890 79010. The product is being recalled because the package may actually contain a milk ingredient which is not declared on the label. The recall of this product is of concern only to those individuals who have an allergy to milk. Consumption may cause a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction in persons with an allergy to milk. No other code dates are affected by this recall.
The 24 oz. Wegmans Italian Classics Seasoned Tomato Sauce is packaged in a clear flexible pouch, and was sold in the prepared foods department of Wegmans stores located in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Maryland.
The affected product would have been available in Wegmans stores between Saturday, November 15 and Thursday, November 20. Wegmans reports that this problem is limited to 108 cases of product, and that all product with the affected code date is no longer on store shelve.
No illnesses have been reported to date.
The problem was discovered by a Wegmans store employee. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the affected code of Italian Classics Seasoned Tomato Sauce actually contained VODKA BLUSH SAUCE which contains milk.
Both recalls were issued for having products containing a milk ingredient in the package, but not on the label.
The vegan product was found because of a customer illness complaint.
The second recall was discovered internally by a store employee.
Both were out in customer's hands.
A full 30% of food recalls are caused by products containing or potentially containing an ingredient that was not shown on the ingredient label and could cause a health risk.
We see large amount of those as containing a milk ingredient.
How can this happen? Shared packaging equipment, shared blending equipment, lack of sufficient cleaning after an allergen containing product was processed, formula change, label change, all can contribute.
The bottom line is that controls are missed. Some human being has to be the final control point in the process. Processors have checks and balances written for their operation. Improper training, lack of cross-training and acceptance of accountability top the list.
Until next time...read your labels and ask the right questions..
Rudy
PANOS Brands Recalls Vegan Rella Cheddar Block
Contact:Kathie Gibbs Borkowski (201) 843-8900 x 425
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE --Saddle Brook, NJ -- November 20, 2008 --- PANOS brands, of Saddle Brook, NJ is recalling Vegan Rella Cheddar Block, (a cheese substitute) with a Sell by date of 12/09/2008. This product is being recalled because it may possibly contain an undeclared milk protein. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk protein run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume this product. No other lot or variety of Vegan is involved.
The product was sold directly to the consumers from their retail stores located nationwide.
The recalled product is packed in 8oz packages with UPC Code 0 37983 00015 4 and a sell by date of 12/09/2008.
There was one reported incident of an allergic reaction associated with the consumption of the product. The product is manufactured by Swan Gardens/Tree of Life, Austell, GA. This recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the Food and Drug Administration.
Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. Issues Voluntary Recall on Wegmans Italian Classics Seasoned Tomato Sauce
Contact:Jo Natale 585-429-3627
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE -- Rochester, NY -- November 20, 2008 -- Wegmans Food Markets, Inc. is initiating a voluntary recall of 24 oz. Wegmans Italian Classics Seasoned Tomato Sauce with a “use-by- date of 11/26/08”, UPC 77890 79010. The product is being recalled because the package may actually contain a milk ingredient which is not declared on the label. The recall of this product is of concern only to those individuals who have an allergy to milk. Consumption may cause a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction in persons with an allergy to milk. No other code dates are affected by this recall.
The 24 oz. Wegmans Italian Classics Seasoned Tomato Sauce is packaged in a clear flexible pouch, and was sold in the prepared foods department of Wegmans stores located in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Maryland.
The affected product would have been available in Wegmans stores between Saturday, November 15 and Thursday, November 20. Wegmans reports that this problem is limited to 108 cases of product, and that all product with the affected code date is no longer on store shelve.
No illnesses have been reported to date.
The problem was discovered by a Wegmans store employee. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the affected code of Italian Classics Seasoned Tomato Sauce actually contained VODKA BLUSH SAUCE which contains milk.
Both recalls were issued for having products containing a milk ingredient in the package, but not on the label.
The vegan product was found because of a customer illness complaint.
The second recall was discovered internally by a store employee.
Both were out in customer's hands.
A full 30% of food recalls are caused by products containing or potentially containing an ingredient that was not shown on the ingredient label and could cause a health risk.
We see large amount of those as containing a milk ingredient.
How can this happen? Shared packaging equipment, shared blending equipment, lack of sufficient cleaning after an allergen containing product was processed, formula change, label change, all can contribute.
The bottom line is that controls are missed. Some human being has to be the final control point in the process. Processors have checks and balances written for their operation. Improper training, lack of cross-training and acceptance of accountability top the list.
Until next time...read your labels and ask the right questions..
Rudy
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Recall on Processed Chicken
The latest from the USDA on meat recalls:
Utah Firm Recalls Frozen Chicken Meals That May Contain Foreign Materials
Recall Release
CLASS I RECALL
FSIS-RC-043-2008
HEALTH RISK: HIGHCongressional and Public Affairs (202) 720-9113 Roger SockmanWASHINGTON, Nov. 17, 2008 - Nestlé Prepared Foods Company, a Springville, Utah, establishment, is recalling approximately 879,565 pounds of frozen chicken meals that may contain foreign materials, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service announced today. The following products are subject to recall:
9.5-ounce packages of “LEAN CUISINE PESTO CHICKEN WITH BOW TIE PASTA” brand frozen meals. Printed on each side of each package is a production code of “8280595912” as well as a use-by date of “Best Before MAY 2010.”
10.5-ounce packages of “LEAN CUISINE CHICKEN MEDITERRANEAN” brand frozen meals. Printed on the side of each package is a production code of “8231595912” or “8241595912” as well as a use-by date of “Best before SEP 2010”; a production code of “8263595912,” “8269595911” or “8274595912,” as well as a use-by date of “Best before OCT 2010”; or, a production code of “8291595912” or “8301595912” as well as a use-by date of “Best before NOV 2010.”
12.5-ounce packages of “LEAN CUISINE CHICKEN TUSCAN” brand frozen meals. Printed on the side of each package is a production code of “8234595911” and a use-by date of “Best before SEP 2009”; a production code of “8253595911” or “8269595912” as well as a use-by date of “Best before OCT 2009”; or, a production code of “8292595911” or “8296595911” as well as a use-by date of “Best before NOV 2009.” Each package also bears the USDA mark of inspection as well as the establishment number “EST P-9018.” The frozen chicken meals were produced on Aug. 18, Aug. 21, Aug. 28, Sept. 9, Sept. 19, Sept. 25, Sept. 30, Oct. 6, Oct. 17-18, Oct. 22 and Oct. 27 and were distributed to retail establishments nationwide. The problem was discovered after the company received consumer complaints and a report of one injury. The company identified the objects as small pieces of hard plastic. FSIS has not received other reports of injury. Anyone concerned about an injury from consumption of the products should consult a medical professional. Media with questions about the recall should contact Company Marketing Communications Manager Roz O’Hearn at (440-264-5170) Consumers with questions about the recall should contact Nestlé Consumer Services Center at (800-227-6188)
How can something like this go on for so long before it is noticed? Nearly three months elapsed and the company might not have known then was it not for consumer complaints and an injury.
What kind of inspection process would catch this type of contamination?
Someone should have noticed pieces of machinery missing in August. Did they see it? Did they tell someone?
What percentage of finished product do they inspect in their Quality Control department?
I bet they have a HACCP plan and surely pass all the USDA inspections so that they can operate.
Does this concern you? I am sure that this company does not want this to happen.
What changes are they making to prevent it from happening again?
Ultimately, each person on the production line and in the maintenance department is responsible to ensure that this cannot occur.
Yours in food safety,
Rudy
Utah Firm Recalls Frozen Chicken Meals That May Contain Foreign Materials
Recall Release
CLASS I RECALL
FSIS-RC-043-2008
HEALTH RISK: HIGHCongressional and Public Affairs (202) 720-9113 Roger SockmanWASHINGTON, Nov. 17, 2008 - Nestlé Prepared Foods Company, a Springville, Utah, establishment, is recalling approximately 879,565 pounds of frozen chicken meals that may contain foreign materials, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service announced today. The following products are subject to recall:
9.5-ounce packages of “LEAN CUISINE PESTO CHICKEN WITH BOW TIE PASTA” brand frozen meals. Printed on each side of each package is a production code of “8280595912” as well as a use-by date of “Best Before MAY 2010.”
10.5-ounce packages of “LEAN CUISINE CHICKEN MEDITERRANEAN” brand frozen meals. Printed on the side of each package is a production code of “8231595912” or “8241595912” as well as a use-by date of “Best before SEP 2010”; a production code of “8263595912,” “8269595911” or “8274595912,” as well as a use-by date of “Best before OCT 2010”; or, a production code of “8291595912” or “8301595912” as well as a use-by date of “Best before NOV 2010.”
12.5-ounce packages of “LEAN CUISINE CHICKEN TUSCAN” brand frozen meals. Printed on the side of each package is a production code of “8234595911” and a use-by date of “Best before SEP 2009”; a production code of “8253595911” or “8269595912” as well as a use-by date of “Best before OCT 2009”; or, a production code of “8292595911” or “8296595911” as well as a use-by date of “Best before NOV 2009.” Each package also bears the USDA mark of inspection as well as the establishment number “EST P-9018.” The frozen chicken meals were produced on Aug. 18, Aug. 21, Aug. 28, Sept. 9, Sept. 19, Sept. 25, Sept. 30, Oct. 6, Oct. 17-18, Oct. 22 and Oct. 27 and were distributed to retail establishments nationwide. The problem was discovered after the company received consumer complaints and a report of one injury. The company identified the objects as small pieces of hard plastic. FSIS has not received other reports of injury. Anyone concerned about an injury from consumption of the products should consult a medical professional. Media with questions about the recall should contact Company Marketing Communications Manager Roz O’Hearn at (440-264-5170) Consumers with questions about the recall should contact Nestlé Consumer Services Center at (800-227-6188)
How can something like this go on for so long before it is noticed? Nearly three months elapsed and the company might not have known then was it not for consumer complaints and an injury.
What kind of inspection process would catch this type of contamination?
Someone should have noticed pieces of machinery missing in August. Did they see it? Did they tell someone?
What percentage of finished product do they inspect in their Quality Control department?
I bet they have a HACCP plan and surely pass all the USDA inspections so that they can operate.
Does this concern you? I am sure that this company does not want this to happen.
What changes are they making to prevent it from happening again?
Ultimately, each person on the production line and in the maintenance department is responsible to ensure that this cannot occur.
Yours in food safety,
Rudy
Monday, November 17, 2008
Newest recall
Over the weekend, another food recall was issued by the FDA.
Seattle's Favorite Gourmet Cookies and Dessert Co Issues Nationwide Allergy Alert on Undeclared Milk in Muffin Tops (November 14)Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:56:00 -0600
Seattle's Favorite Gourmet Cookies and Dessert Co. is recalling Orange Cranberry and Banana Nut Muffin Tops because they contain undeclared milk. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk run the risk of serious or life threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products.
How can this happen? Did someone use the wrong ingredients? Did someone change the label and not check ingredients against the actual formula being used? Is the product made on equipment that is shared with items containing allergens? Did mix from one item get reworked with mix of a different item, in an effort to reduce product loss? Have all the employees been trained about allergens and proper clean up and changeovers?
Do food companies understand the importance of their role in providing the public with wholesome and safe food products? What can you do as a consumer to protect yourself?
In upcoming articles, we will review labelling and what you questions you need to ask to protect yourself and your family.
Rudy
Seattle's Favorite Gourmet Cookies and Dessert Co Issues Nationwide Allergy Alert on Undeclared Milk in Muffin Tops (November 14)Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:56:00 -0600
Seattle's Favorite Gourmet Cookies and Dessert Co. is recalling Orange Cranberry and Banana Nut Muffin Tops because they contain undeclared milk. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk run the risk of serious or life threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products.
How can this happen? Did someone use the wrong ingredients? Did someone change the label and not check ingredients against the actual formula being used? Is the product made on equipment that is shared with items containing allergens? Did mix from one item get reworked with mix of a different item, in an effort to reduce product loss? Have all the employees been trained about allergens and proper clean up and changeovers?
Do food companies understand the importance of their role in providing the public with wholesome and safe food products? What can you do as a consumer to protect yourself?
In upcoming articles, we will review labelling and what you questions you need to ask to protect yourself and your family.
Rudy
Friday, November 14, 2008
Answering Code dating questions
For those readers who have questions or comments, please comment and ask and I will find the answer for you.
Today, products have some coding on them. Whether it is food or drugs or other manufactured items, some coding is required and some is used for internal tracking by the manufacturer.
On food products, the Bioterrorism Act required that manufacturers be able to track forward one step in the process and one back. In meaning, this is knowing where your ingredients came from and how much and what lot codes and knowing where you sent your products by name and lot number and codes. It doesn't however dictate that code, so that each manufacturer has their own. Normally, the code identifies a product packaged on a certain shift, certain machine, and certain amount.
The code that pertains to a date, let's the manufacturer and sometimes the consumer know what date it was produced or should be purchased by or used by.
The open dating policy is an actual month, day, year. If it states purchase by, then it should be useable for some period of time, after this. The company that manufactures the product should be able to tell you how long it should last past sell by date. Sell by date helps for rotation of product and controls the liability of the manufacturer and retailer. For example: if you purchase milk that shows a sell by date of Nov. 14, 2008 then it should last 3 to 5 days past that point.
Use by date should be the last day that you use a product. Could it still be useable? Yes of course, however the effectiveness and quality of the product may be diminished. It is the last day of guarantee by the manufacturer or retailer. If it is a product that you are going to consume why take the chance.
Sometimes dating is done by Julian date. This would be day of the year with January 1 being day 001 and December 31st day 365. You could also see a year indicated, generally the last two numbers of the year.
Please let me know if you have specific code dating issues and I will search them for you.
Rudy
Today, products have some coding on them. Whether it is food or drugs or other manufactured items, some coding is required and some is used for internal tracking by the manufacturer.
On food products, the Bioterrorism Act required that manufacturers be able to track forward one step in the process and one back. In meaning, this is knowing where your ingredients came from and how much and what lot codes and knowing where you sent your products by name and lot number and codes. It doesn't however dictate that code, so that each manufacturer has their own. Normally, the code identifies a product packaged on a certain shift, certain machine, and certain amount.
The code that pertains to a date, let's the manufacturer and sometimes the consumer know what date it was produced or should be purchased by or used by.
The open dating policy is an actual month, day, year. If it states purchase by, then it should be useable for some period of time, after this. The company that manufactures the product should be able to tell you how long it should last past sell by date. Sell by date helps for rotation of product and controls the liability of the manufacturer and retailer. For example: if you purchase milk that shows a sell by date of Nov. 14, 2008 then it should last 3 to 5 days past that point.
Use by date should be the last day that you use a product. Could it still be useable? Yes of course, however the effectiveness and quality of the product may be diminished. It is the last day of guarantee by the manufacturer or retailer. If it is a product that you are going to consume why take the chance.
Sometimes dating is done by Julian date. This would be day of the year with January 1 being day 001 and December 31st day 365. You could also see a year indicated, generally the last two numbers of the year.
Please let me know if you have specific code dating issues and I will search them for you.
Rudy
Today's FDA alerts
The Associated Press reported today that "November 14, 2008 - Washington--U.S. government health officials on Thursday ordered dozens of imported foods from China held at the border as possible health risks. Most are ethnic treats, including snacks, drinks and chocolates."
Rep. Rosa DeLauro was quoted as saying the following:
"The FDA should have acted sooner to ban these milk products from entering the country," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro, chairwoman of a panel that oversees the FDA budget. She urged that egg and fish products also be tested, since melamine has been added to animal feed in China.
"Clearly, the problems involving melamine in China are significantly deeper than FDA would have us believe," DeLauro said.
My feeling is that it is imperative that our food companies and our consumers demand that country of origin is designated on all products. Even in the current economic conditions, we need to support grown, produced and manufactured in the United States. For our health and safety, for the good of our citizens, support "home grown" needs to mean something. It used to and can again.
Rudy
Rep. Rosa DeLauro was quoted as saying the following:
"The FDA should have acted sooner to ban these milk products from entering the country," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro, chairwoman of a panel that oversees the FDA budget. She urged that egg and fish products also be tested, since melamine has been added to animal feed in China.
"Clearly, the problems involving melamine in China are significantly deeper than FDA would have us believe," DeLauro said.
My feeling is that it is imperative that our food companies and our consumers demand that country of origin is designated on all products. Even in the current economic conditions, we need to support grown, produced and manufactured in the United States. For our health and safety, for the good of our citizens, support "home grown" needs to mean something. It used to and can again.
Rudy
Thursday, November 13, 2008
FDA recalls this week
Below are two recalls issued this week. How can these happen?
Improper sanitation procedures, incomplete labelling, use of raw materials from outside the U.S. are part of cause. Lack of control in the manufacturing plants and lack of understanding of exactly what a control is and the training to make controls effective contribute to product recalls. How many of us are put at risk by improper controls?
Stay informed and stay healthy.
Rudy
Amy's Kitchen Inc. Issues Allergy Alert and Voluntary National Recall due to Possible Undeclared Milk in Tofu Scramble in a Pocket Sandwich; Lot Code H148 (November 7)Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:42:00 -0600
The products could cause an allergic reaction if consumed by any individuals allergic to milk. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to dairy products run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume the product. Consumers without milk allergies can safely consume the product.
Nestle Withdraws Nestle Farinha Lactea Cereal in the United States (November 3)Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:52:00 -0600
Nestle is withdrawing Nestle Farinha Lactea cereal in the United States. Nestle is taking this action as we have learned that the product may contain residual traces of a pesticide not currently approved for use on wheat in the U.S. While the pesticide is approved for use in Brazil and the noted levels are well below Brazilian standards, it is not used on wheat products in the United States and therefore there is no set standard for its presence in cereal. The pesticide is permitted in the United States on grain crops other than wheat.
Improper sanitation procedures, incomplete labelling, use of raw materials from outside the U.S. are part of cause. Lack of control in the manufacturing plants and lack of understanding of exactly what a control is and the training to make controls effective contribute to product recalls. How many of us are put at risk by improper controls?
Stay informed and stay healthy.
Rudy
Amy's Kitchen Inc. Issues Allergy Alert and Voluntary National Recall due to Possible Undeclared Milk in Tofu Scramble in a Pocket Sandwich; Lot Code H148 (November 7)Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:42:00 -0600
The products could cause an allergic reaction if consumed by any individuals allergic to milk. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to dairy products run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume the product. Consumers without milk allergies can safely consume the product.
Nestle Withdraws Nestle Farinha Lactea Cereal in the United States (November 3)Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:52:00 -0600
Nestle is withdrawing Nestle Farinha Lactea cereal in the United States. Nestle is taking this action as we have learned that the product may contain residual traces of a pesticide not currently approved for use on wheat in the U.S. While the pesticide is approved for use in Brazil and the noted levels are well below Brazilian standards, it is not used on wheat products in the United States and therefore there is no set standard for its presence in cereal. The pesticide is permitted in the United States on grain crops other than wheat.
Food Safety in a Down Market Economy
As the certainty of our economy, our company's future, and our personal future is at risk, we each react differently.
As individuals, even though we often are looking for change, we want things to stay constant. When we worry about the basic essentials for living, food, clothing and shelter, we lose our focus on the current job that is being performed. If that is food handling, sanitation of equipment, proper packaging, plant security, our personal health, it puts us and our company in liability. The less focus we have, the greater the risk for missing a step in the current standard operating procedure.
From a company standpoint, now is not the time to cut back on spending on training and follow up. This will only put your company in greater liability. Focus on the job at hand, protect your customers, your employees, your company.
Look for ways to improve training.
As individuals, even though we often are looking for change, we want things to stay constant. When we worry about the basic essentials for living, food, clothing and shelter, we lose our focus on the current job that is being performed. If that is food handling, sanitation of equipment, proper packaging, plant security, our personal health, it puts us and our company in liability. The less focus we have, the greater the risk for missing a step in the current standard operating procedure.
From a company standpoint, now is not the time to cut back on spending on training and follow up. This will only put your company in greater liability. Focus on the job at hand, protect your customers, your employees, your company.
Look for ways to improve training.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
